>>>>Oh, yeah. And please forget the 40k or so folks a year, including kids, who die because they can't get health insurance. The health insurance industry is working very hard to make you forget and they are VERY VERY good at it.<<<<
Another bogus, specious claim designed to stampede America into approving government run health care for everyone (Except Congress).
Excellent, we have made headway. Given the choice, you didn't dispute the Exxon claim. Good for you!
So what if its just 20,000 - or 10,000?
For the sake of arguement, let's say that the mortatily rate of people was 20% higher for the uninsured than the insured with the same life style, health and everything else. Let's say that amounted to 10,000 extra deaths per year. Just as a number to use, no one has any idea what the accurate figure is.
If we spent $200 billion extra in government money every year to insure "everybody" - and no plan currently considered will do so - will it save a net 10,000 a year? The answer is no.
The money being pulled out of the economy and the other various costs will have all sorts of negative costs on everyone -
1) People will buy cheaper cars. That will drive up the number of automotive deaths, which currently amount to about 50,000 a year, the last I checked.
2) The poor will have less money for food.
3) The more well off will have less to invest, further depressing the economy and limiting opportunity and jobs.
4) Higher quality health professionals will migrate out of the system and in some cases out of the country. (Look at the effects of the NHS for the flight of highly qualified UK doctors out of Britain.) That will lead to more deaths among the populance.
5) Reduced investment in the entire health care and medicine field because of reduced possibility of good returns. That will limit the development of new techniques and of new drugs. More lives lost.
6) Reduced economic growth, reduced jobs, reduced tax base, further slippage by the US vis a vis the rest of the world.
7) Further deterioration of the USA into a "Nanny State", further reliance upon the almighty govenrment instead of taking personal responsibility.
etc. etc. etc.
Would the consequences mean that more than the fictional 10,000 ended up dieing each year? We already know that the more affluent a society is, the longer the average lifespan. So it is a very valid question. Yet, in the rush to impose an enormous government run health care system, no one has studied the consequences.
So many thought that the cash for klunkers deal was great. Now it turns out the the increased sales cost the government (meaning every American citizen) $24,000 per extra vehicle sold. At that price, only the auto unions could support that program.