So, interlake played a very great game against the Archbishop Murphy Wildcats. Interlake advances to the 2A state championship winning 1-0. However, they play 3A during the league and move down to 2A for state. What the heck?! I seriously think that they can compete and win 3A state. After all, they did finish second and undefeated in their 3A conference. Someone please get #20 on Interlake a full ride to a D1 school. She has talent and a bright future. She commanded the midfield and took control of the game. On the other hand, the wildcats had some opportunities, but could not get one in the back of the net. The student section was too quiet and uninvolved. They need to change that. The girls, especially the midfield (except Stephanie Conard), lost their shape and excessively dropped the ball, which hurts the team. Stephanie Conard is the most underated midfielder in 2A and should've recieved conference first team.
Off topic, but couldn't resist.....The above post constitutes "bashing children"? How? Where?
First two sentences: "
So, interlake played a very great game against the Archbishop Murphy Wildcats. Interlake advances to the 2A state championship winning 1-0." A compliment to a
team, Interlake, followed by a neutral, factual statement that did not reference a kid.
Next two sentences: "
However, they play 3A during the league and move down to 2A for state. What the heck?!" A factual statement concerning a
team, and then a a throw-away statement.
Next two sentences: "
I seriously think that they can compete and win 3A state. After all, they did finish second and undefeated in their 3A conference." An expression of a positive opinion regarding a
team, and a factual statement about a
team.
Still looking for the "bashing" that earned a threat of a ban......Moving on to the remainder of the post:
"
Someone please get #20 on Interlake a full ride to a D1 school. She has talent and a bright future. She commanded the midfield and took control of the game. " A complimentary statement re: a player.
"
On the other hand, the wildcats had some opportunities, but could not get one in the back of the net. " Is this the prohibited statement of opinion?? Does commenting about a high school team's inability to finish now constitute prohibited bashing? If so, then EW64 should be banned immediately
"
The student section was too quiet and uninvolved. They need to change that." No individual identified. If this warranted a threat of a ban, then I am
"
The girls, especially the midfield (except Stephanie Conard), lost their shape and excessively dropped the ball, which hurts the team.Stephanie Conard is the most underated midfielder in 2A and should've recieved conference first team." Probably the culprit, but notice the lack of criticism directed at a particular player. A compliment for Stephanie Conrad,and then an opinion that ATM's midfield lost their shape and dropped the ball too much. If commenting about a high school team's lack of shape in midfield and expressing an opinion about a tactic, i.e., dropping the ball, constitues "bashing" children, I guess I better stop posting (although I hardly post here anymore).
Call me politically incorrect, an insensitive redneck from eastern Washington, a meat-eating breeder of heifers, or intellectually deficient (all criticisms are allowed as I am not a child in terms of age), but I fail to see how the post for the ATM kid can in any way be characterized as "bashing" a child. Ban whomever you want for any reason you like, but the post in question does not constitute "bashing" a child.
Author
Topic: High School Game results (Read 40146 times)