Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[2 CENTS]

1   SSSFC Crush 95 _____________   15.6
2   Three Rivers SC 95 Rage_______   14.7
3   Evergreen GU11 Green_________   14.2
4   Crossfire Premier 95 – Thomas___   13.4
5   Emerald City FC F95 Green______   13.2
6   FCV Courage_________________   
7   Washington Premier FC Black____   13
8   Eastside FC 95 Red____________   12
9   WestSound FC 95 Red_________   9.41
10   Eastside FC 95 White__________   9.31
11   Reign 95 Purple_______________   9.14
12   NW Nationals G95 Red_________   8.15
13   CPSC Timbers Navy___________   
14   SSC Patriots 95-Blue __________   7.87
15   Crossfire Premier 95 – Schmetzer_   7.77
16   CPSC Timbers Navy___________   
17   CPSC Timbers Royal___________   
18   FC Aanvallen 95 ______________   7.35
19   FC Mukilteo Angels____________   7.34
20   FC Kent Fusion 95 ____________   6.97
21   Snohomish United – Pingrey_____   6.6
22   FCV Glory___________________   
23   Harbor FC '95 ________________   6.5
24   Reign 95 Black________________   6.46
25   Crossfire Premier 95-D. Redwine _   6.42
26   Kajumulo Farasi_______________   5.89
27   SSSFC 95 Strikers ____________   5.07
28   Dosveedanya 95 White_________   4.93
29   FWU Reign 95 White __________   4.78
30   Bainbridge FC '95 Blue _________   4.44
31   FC Shoreline Sapphires_________   4.08
32   SSSFC Crush 96 _____________   4.05
33   Extreme White________________   4.04
34   F.C. Mukilteo Storm____________   3.94
35   Crossfire Premier 95-Stauber ____   3.9
36   Washington Premier FC White___   3.86
37   Dosveedanya 95 Red__________   3.83
38   WestSound FC 95 White________   3.77
39   Badger F.C. 95_______________   3.74
40   Legacy Cougars______________   3.73
41   SCYSC GU11 Silver___________   3.6
42   Skagit Storm FC95 Red (GU11)__   3.5
43   Snohomish United Fire_________   3.47
44   FC Silver Lake Venom_________   3.43
45   Crossfire Select 95-Hill _________   3.33
46   NWN G95 White______________   3.33
47   Norpoint FC 95 Spirit __________   3.21
48   MRFC-95 Cosmos ____________   2.95
49   Cascade Select Strikers ________   2.72
50   NW Nationals G95 Blue_________   2.66
51   Eastside FC 95 Dev ___________   2.51
52   Bainbridge FC '95 White ________   2.39
53   HSA Eagles 96 _______________   2.23
54   Nitro _______________________   2.2
55   Crossfire Select 95-Wyrick ______   2.14
56   FC Alliance White '95 __________   2.07
57   FPSC Net Wreckers '95 ________   1.96
58   Southhill Revolution G95 - Black _   1.9
59   Southhill Revolution G95 - Red __   1.84
60   Spokane Shadow_____________   1.72
61   CW Crush___________________   ?
62   FCSC Nemesis_______________   ?
63   SC Eclipse___________________   1.52
64   HSA Eagles 95 Griffiths_________   1.42
65   SSSFC Orion ________________   1.31
66   Panthers ____________________   1.18
67   NK Blast 95 __________________   1.03
68   Eastside FC 95 Blue ___________   0.97
69   SSC Patriots 95-Red ___________   0.89
70   TUSK Wild Cats ______________   0.67
71   Sparta 95 red ________________   0.62
72   Force FC 95 Mellick___________   0.49
73   NK Magic 95 _________________   0.45
74   FC Marauders 95 Blue Rennick___   0.23
75   Goalstars ____________________   0.11
76   MV Sloan ___________________   0.02
77   MV Rubadue ________________   0.02
78   FC Silverlake Bulldogs__________   0.01
79   Washington Premier FC 95 Gold _   -0.1
80   HSA Eagles 95 Danielson_______   -0.1
81   HSC Firebees ________________   -0.2
82   FWU SWAT _________________   -0.3
83   Emerald City FC F95 White_____   -0.3
84   FWU Cheetahs ______________   -0.3
85   Crossfire Premier 95-Barton _____   -0.3
86   FC Alliance Blue '95 ___________   -0.3
87   ESA 95______________________   -0.6
88   FWU Xtreme _________________   -0.8
89   Blackhills FC '95 ______________   -0.8
90   TUSK American Girls __________   -0.9
91   Extreme Green________________   -2.1

[SHARK]

CPSC Timbers Navy @ 13 & 16  :?:

[Brat Jr]

Questions:
Did these include summer tourneys?
Are these based on what Blue Chip does?

I like what I see except for Farasi and HSA Eagles Griffiths. Didn't Farasi go 12-0-2 this season? And Griffiths plays a very good game. Nice foot work, GREAT pressure and passes that connect.

Just curious and definately NOT complaining!  :mrgreen:

[Just4Kids]

Questions:
Did these include summer tourneys?
Are these based on what Blue Chip does?

I like what I see except for Farasi and HSA Eagles Griffiths. Didn't Farasi go 12-0-2 this season? And Griffiths plays a very good game. Nice foot work, GREAT pressure and passes that connect.

Just curious and definately NOT complaining!  :mrgreen:

My opinion.....    

District leagues in the Seattle are not as tough as they were previous years due to PDL.  The question I have is where would Xfire-Redwine be if there were no PDL.  DIII GT?  Doubt it.  That is one of the things I have been struggling with this year going into the Cups.  The teams in the Districts, how good are they?  Would any of the bottom 7 teams be in DIII GT if it were not for the PDL?  

One thing I can say for sure that there are a lot of unknowns, especially in the Commissioner's Cup.  I think the Challenge Cup is a little clearer, not much, due to the fact that those teams have played more tournaments and more than likely each other this year already.  You do not have that in the Commissioners Cup.  

All in all, it will be a blast.

[TeamAuburn]

What do the numbers to the side of the team mean?

[Great Dane]

Maybe 2 Cents is Blue Chip..... :roll:  Accidental post as 2 cents when he should have been Blue Chip... :roll:   Well, realistically...I seriously doubt it.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

[TeamAuburn]

My opinion.....    

District leagues in the Seattle are not as tough as they were previous years due to PDL.  The question I have is where would Xfire-Redwine be if there were no PDL.  DIII GT?  Doubt it.  That is one of the things I have been struggling with this year going into the Cups.  The teams in the Districts, how good are they?  Would any of the bottom 7 teams be in DIII GT if it were not for the PDL?  

Compared to last year's U11s, this year's U12 seem to have similar GT teams at PDL  1A and GU13GT.  PDL 1B and 1D are the low gold/silver teams from D3 last year.  PDL1C is a mix of gold and silver-its all over the board.

[2 CENTS]

CPSC Timbers Navy @ 13 & 16  :?:

oops, didn't have Dist 5 statistics so I thought it would be better to insert them based off of other rankings rather than leaving them out.

[2 CENTS]

Questions:
Did these include summer tourneys?
No, this is fall league play,
Are these based on what Blue Chip does?
similar to BC, probably a different calculation,

I like what I see except for Farasi and HSA Eagles Griffiths. Didn't Farasi go 12-0-2 this season? And Griffiths plays a very good game. Nice foot work, GREAT pressure and passes that connect.
calculation has a difficulty of competition factor.
to rank high you need to have wins.

Just curious and definately NOT complaining!  :mrgreen:

I think all of them are good teams,
the ranking doesn't mean much it's just interesting to look at.
 

[2 CENTS]

What do the numbers to the side of the team mean?

the #'s are the final sum of a series of calculations.
it shows how close some of the teams are.

[2 CENTS]

My opinion.....    

District leagues in the Seattle are not as tough as they were previous years due to PDL.  The question I have is where would Xfire-Redwine be if there were no PDL.  DIII GT?  Doubt it.  That is one of the things I have been struggling with this year going into the Cups.  The teams in the Districts, how good are they?  Would any of the bottom 7 teams be in DIII GT if it were not for the PDL?  

Compared to last year's U11s, this year's U12 seem to have similar GT teams at PDL  1A and GU13GT.  PDL 1B and 1D are the low gold/silver teams from D3 last year.  PDL1C is a mix of gold and silver-its all over the board.

TA is right,
what would have been this years U11 GT is now split between GT, PDL 1A & PDL1C.

[The Ringer]

Not to bad, however why don't we just be patient and it all will work it self out at the Challenge/Commish Cup.  Merry Christmas!  There are parts of this I would change but my mind is in a peaceful, sunny place I just left...Mexico.  No need to argue with you on Christmas, buddy!

[Ninja]

Great stuff, looks like some teams may be stronger than some think :shock:

[Great Dane]

Questions:
Did these include summer tourneys?
No, this is fall league play,
Are these based on what Blue Chip does?
similar to BC, probably a different calculation,

I like what I see except for Farasi and HSA Eagles Griffiths. Didn't Farasi go 12-0-2 this season? And Griffiths plays a very good game. Nice foot work, GREAT pressure and passes that connect.
calculation has a difficulty of competition factor.
to rank high you need to have wins.

Just curious and definately NOT complaining!  :mrgreen:

I think all of them are good teams,
the ranking doesn't mean much it's just interesting to look at.
 

Since your rankings are only based on fall league play and not the entire year, then maybe the title of the thread should have been a bit different.  In any case, were you surprised the Crush came out as the number one team?  Did you adjust any of your calculations based on what you thought were weird results, or was this simply what came out when you ran it the first time, i.e. did you incorporate any human input into these rankings or just let the numbers do the talking?  Lastly, what kind of weight was put on the various leagues out there the team played in, i.e. does it make a difference in your calc if a team played PDL1-A versus let's say GT?  Just curious.

[overachiever]

Questions:
Did these include summer tourneys?
No, this is fall league play,
Are these based on what Blue Chip does?
similar to BC, probably a different calculation,

I like what I see except for Farasi and HSA Eagles Griffiths. Didn't Farasi go 12-0-2 this season? And Griffiths plays a very good game. Nice foot work, GREAT pressure and passes that connect.
calculation has a difficulty of competition factor.
to rank high you need to have wins.

Just curious and definately NOT complaining!  :mrgreen:

I think all of them are good teams,
the ranking doesn't mean much it's just interesting to look at.
 

Since your rankings are only based on fall league play and not the entire year, then maybe the title of the thread should have been a bit different.  In any case, were you surprised the Crush came out as the number one team?  Did you adjust any of your calculations based on what you thought were weird results, or was this simply what came out when you ran it the first time, i.e. did you incorporate any human input into these rankings or just let the numbers do the talking?  Lastly, what kind of weight was put on the various leagues out there the team played in, i.e. does it make a difference in your calc if a team played PDL1-A versus let's say GT?  Just curious.

I too am interested in how this is calculated.  More weight must be given for PDL teams?.......specifically looking at U12 PDL teams such as Marauders (who had no wins) and Westsound who had one win (over Marauders) are ranked higher than teams finishing well in GU12 District III Gold Titanium - So if someone could shed some light on how rankings are established that would be great.

[Great Dane]

Questions:
Did these include summer tourneys?
No, this is fall league play,
Are these based on what Blue Chip does?
similar to BC, probably a different calculation,

I like what I see except for Farasi and HSA Eagles Griffiths. Didn't Farasi go 12-0-2 this season? And Griffiths plays a very good game. Nice foot work, GREAT pressure and passes that connect.
calculation has a difficulty of competition factor.
to rank high you need to have wins.

Just curious and definately NOT complaining!  :mrgreen:

I think all of them are good teams,
the ranking doesn't mean much it's just interesting to look at.
 

Since your rankings are only based on fall league play and not the entire year, then maybe the title of the thread should have been a bit different.  In any case, were you surprised the Crush came out as the number one team?  Did you adjust any of your calculations based on what you thought were weird results, or was this simply what came out when you ran it the first time, i.e. did you incorporate any human input into these rankings or just let the numbers do the talking?  Lastly, what kind of weight was put on the various leagues out there the team played in, i.e. does it make a difference in your calc if a team played PDL1-A versus let's say GT?  Just curious.

I too am interested in how this is calculated.  More weight must be given for PDL teams?.......specifically looking at U12 PDL teams such as Marauders (who had no wins) and Westsound who had one win (over Marauders) are ranked higher than teams finishing well in GU12 District III Gold Titanium - So if someone could shed some light on how rankings are established that would be great.

 
I agree with your point that not all PDL teams should get the nod over others just because they are in the PDL (Marauders is a good example), yet it's hard to argue that in general the teams playing in the PDL face a more difficult schedule and that should be factored in some how some way.  In the case of the U-11s, I know the Crush did real well in the fall and maybe they deserve the top ranking, but they were not faced with playing Crossfire, Eastsdie, Emerald City, WPFC Black, NWN, etc. week after week.

[Pollyana]

The Dane has a point. Take nothing away from Crush - running the table in any league is an extraordinary accomplishment. It is apparent, however, that the establishment of the PDL had an effect upon the "depth" of top teams at District 3 GT and District 1 Gold. PDL 1-C ran 3 or 4 deep. PDL 1A ran 5 deep. I am just not convinced that this remarkable record makes them better than a WPFC team that went 6-3-3 against tough competiion every week. That's the problem with numbers; the application of a formula may be objective, but setting the criteria for your formula is highly subjective.

[Great Dane]

The Dane has a point. Take nothing away from Crush - running the table in any league is an extraordinary accomplishment. It is apparent, however, that the establishment of the PDL had an effect upon the "depth" of top teams at District 3 GT and District 1 Gold. PDL 1-C ran 3 or 4 deep. PDL 1A ran 5 deep. I am just not convinced that this remarkable record makes them better than a WPFC team that went 6-3-3 against tough competiion every week. That's the problem with numbers; the application of a formula may be objective, but setting the criteria for your formula is highly subjective.

Yet, it's quality teams like the Crush (that haven't played in the PDL) that makes talking about predictions so much fun!  How will they do?  Where will they end up?  Where should they have been predicted to land?  Hard to tell.   It's too bad the Auburn Strikers didn't play in the U-11 Challenge Cup too, because that would have been another non-PDL quality team fun to speculate about.  I'd say the Crush is probably right there in the middle of all the top teams, but it's hard to put a finger on it until the games begin....soooooo.....let the games begin ALREADY!!!  I'm getting tired of cold practices in the rain, so I'm sure the girls are too...let's get ready to rummmmmmmble!!!!   :mrgreen:

[XCV]

rumble?...genius :?

[Dragon]

ok, play nice all you U11 Mafia :lol: