Topic: U11 Rankings (Read 1896 times)

Dragon · « **on:** November 30, 2005, 10:34:51 PM »

Stole this from Main Soccer page

http://washingtonrankings.no-ip.org:12300/WashingtonGirls94Rankings_LATEST.html

Dragon wonder who do these rankings :roll:

Maybe it Blue Chip :mrgreen:

Dragon · « **Reply #1 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:37:47 PM »

Here whole latest page so you don't have to open

1 FC Vancouver Xplosion 0.9500000000
2 Crossfire - P. Lombard 0.9227731950
3 FC Royals Blue 0.8742842749
4 Eastside FC Red 0.8510547222
5 Reign Purple 0.8006666627
6 Columbia Timbers 1 0.7659648467
7 FC Crush 1 0.7571752419
8 NWN Red 0.7328477867
9 Harbor FC Massee 0.7046017104
10 SSC Patriots 0.7036670827
11 HSA Eagles - Laity 4 0.6897972816
12 SC Eclipse - Thomas 1 0.6514269516
13 Eastside FC White 1 0.6465423499
14 Dosveedayna 1 0.6453594109
15 Crossfire - A. Lombard 3 0.6433131952
16 Norpoint FC Americans 1 0.6141872134
17 Evergreen Soccer Academy 1 0.6112847669
18 FC Royals White 0.5950477201
19 FCSC Nemesis 0.5813577542
20 TCYSA Velocity 0.5652457777
21 Marysville Force 0.5460713830
22 NWN Blue 0.5409607824
23 FC Alliance Gold 0.5280820411
24 Snohomish United Chika Lobos 0.5131364978
25 FC Silverlake Stars 1 0.5078421466
26 FC Kitsap - Megson 1 0.5020206091
27 FC Everett 2 0.4988871024
28 FC Marauders Blue 0.4919197788
29 HSC Thunderbirds Black 4 0.4888240685
30 SC Eclipse - Wright 0.4773746201
31 Crossfire - Lim 0.4757789223
32 Cascade Select Quest 4 0.4727600167
33 Reign White 0.4718124949
34 FC Mukilteo Glory 0.4633928011
35 Eastside FC Blue 0.4576639741
36 Badger FC 1 0.4575154043
37 HSA Eagles - Griffiths 5 0.4510237709
38 FC Aanvallen Green 0.4362536939
39 FC Kent Spirit 0.4346652889
40 Sky River Extreme 0.4277837260
41 Emerald City FC Green 0.4135127394
42 Harbor FC Crompton 2 0.4008037806
43 Sparta 1 0.3950451900
44 Emerald City FC White 1 0.3943392921
45 Revolution 2 0.3797189927
46 MRFC Avalanche 0.3746776297
47 FC Kent Forza 0.3668015499
48 Snohomish United Red 0.3515031206
49 Crossfire - Beiler 0.1956748380
50 Bainbridge FC Blue 0.0100000000
* An insufficient number of game results exist to accurately rank the following teams.
* 51 Bainbridge FC Footfire 0.5853776562
* 52 CB United 0.5800564963
* 53 ISC Arsenal Blue 0.5540094880
* 54 Highlands FC Wild 0.4261778102
* 55 Heartbreakers 0.3054934627

Look like FCV Xplosion is rockin and rollin' ,

Way to go gals :mrgreen:

Dragon · « **Reply #2 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:44:00 PM »

Funny thing is (with exception of FCV) top 8 is same as Dragon's "Elite 8" :lol: :lol: :lol:

Maybe need to move Eclipse out and Xplosion in :mrgreen:

bluebleeder · « **Reply #3 on:** November 30, 2005, 11:25:34 PM »

You could always look here at
http://www.nationalsoccerranking.com/washington.htm

This is how they rank them:

Rankings as of November 30, 2005

U-11

1. Columbia Timbers Red 94 (Columbia, WA)

2. Eastside FC 94 Red (Bellevue, WA)

3. FC Crush Academy (Seattle, WA)

4. FC Vancouver Xplosion (Vancouver, WA)

5. Crossfire Premier 94 - A. Lombard (Redmond, WA)

Our RRGs didnt even make the top 5.

All their hearts will be broken I am sure.

Squash · « **Reply #4 on:** November 30, 2005, 11:28:13 PM »

Quote from: "bluebleeder"

You could always look here at
http://www.nationalsoccerranking.com/washington.htm

This is how they rank them:

Rankings as of November 30, 2005

U-11

1. Columbia Timbers Red 94 (Columbia, WA)

2. Eastside FC 94 Red (Bellevue, WA)

3. FC Crush Academy (Seattle, WA)

4. FC Vancouver Xplosion (Vancouver, WA)

5. Crossfire Premier 94 - A. Lombard (Redmond, WA)

Our RRGs didnt even make the top 5. All their hearts will be broken I am sure.

That list is exactly why the rankings are lame..no offense to the teams named, but having Crossfire A.Lombard listed before the P Lombard says it all. Next!!!!! :lol:

Dragon · « **Reply #5 on:** November 30, 2005, 11:33:57 PM »

Yeah the first Rankings look more like what Dragon would put down

crazygolf3 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 01, 2005, 12:28:42 AM »

The first one is better because it ranks Washington teams only. All this national rankings stuff is way off base.

Apple · « **Reply #7 on:** December 01, 2005, 12:46:29 AM »

I agree i like the first list better. The second list might of made a mistake mixing up the x-fire teams. Cascade is 32. It is better than 33.

Go Cascade

Soccer Freak · « **Reply #8 on:** December 01, 2005, 02:04:56 AM »

These rankings are great for what?

Realistically who is the only undefeated U11 team in Washington?? No ties, no losses!! Of course it coudl change at any time, but for now I believe the 94 Royals are #1, they will attempt to prove it once again this weekend!!!

Also, remember these are 9, 10 and 11 yr old girls. Do you think they really read it, or is it the parents???

Play on · « **Reply #9 on:** December 01, 2005, 10:18:50 AM »

It's all for the Crazy Parents of course. Mass speculation. that's what makes this site sooo much fun!

Dragon · « **Reply #10 on:** December 01, 2005, 10:52:37 AM »

All in good fun :mrgreen:

cheese · « **Reply #11 on:** December 01, 2005, 11:36:34 AM »

The kids just want to be kids and have fun.

The CP's want bragging rights and trophys. :twisted:

Fun, fun, fun

bluebleeder · « **Reply #12 on:** December 01, 2005, 01:33:28 PM »

You know, I honestly think people under estimate these girls. You would be surprised at how many of these young ladies think about winning. It is definately about them having fun, but at this age, they do have a sense of competition and they do care about winning and losing, that is why they cheer or cry after each game. So to say they just want to have fun is not a true statement. Now I agree that rankings are more for the CPs, but lets be realistic, these girls are competitive and want to have metal just like the older girls.

cheese · « **Reply #13 on:** December 01, 2005, 02:05:34 PM »

Listen to the CP's on the sidelines, and then listen to the DD's on the bench cheering on the team. Yes the ones on the bench give an occasional "go team" but it's mostly from the CP's. :?
Yes the girls are extremely competitive and want to win all games...who doesn't, but if they won all the games and didn't have fun they would either play for a diff. team next year or just quit.

As they get a little older winning will become just about everything and override the fun factor and even pain. Not too many girls at this age will play with lots of pain, older ones rub it off, get back up, choke back the tears and git-er-done.

It's the CP's who strive to make their DD's better and play on the best team. Just ask your DD if she wants to leave her friends or play on the best team in the state.

Dragon · « **Reply #14 on:** December 01, 2005, 02:06:47 PM »

Dragonkid just wants to play :?

bluebleeder · « **Reply #15 on:** December 01, 2005, 02:25:21 PM »

Quote from: "cheese"

Listen to the CP's on the sidelines, and then listen to the DD's on the bench cheering on the team. Yes the ones on the bench give an occasional "go team" but it's mostly from the CP's. :?
Yes the girls are extremely competitive and want to win all games...who doesn't, but if they won all the games and didn't have fun they would either play for a diff. team next year or just quit.

As they get a little older winning will become just about everything and override the fun factor and even pain. Not too many girls at this age will play with lots of pain, older ones rub it off, get back up, choke back the tears and git-er-done.

It's the CP's who strive to make their DD's better and play on the best team. Just ask your DD if she wants to leave her friends or play on the best team in the state.

I couldn't agree with you more, but just sounded like you were saying the girls just want to have fun and nothing else is important.

Dragon · « **Reply #16 on:** December 01, 2005, 02:51:36 PM »

As far as Cyndie Lauper is concerned, Girls DO just wanna have fun

Lets keep it lite ya'll, Every DD is different.

Dragon, believe "most" kids do things to please people at this age, (not saying every kid though)

Boys tend to be a little different though :?

rollercoaster · « **Reply #17 on:** December 01, 2005, 03:21:52 PM »

:lol: You can tell JCub doesn't do those Washington rankings.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Dos is actually in the top 20!!

Dragon · « **Reply #18 on:** December 01, 2005, 03:34:42 PM »

Ha Ha, Gotcha good on that one J-man :lol:

tiekesccr · « **Reply #19 on:** December 01, 2005, 06:18:00 PM »

:shock: :shock: Thought the rankings interesting but really means little to the kids, just helps us CP's. :oops: I still think that in the end a team from out of no where steps up and does not win the whole thing, but does some real damage to some CP's hopes and some clubs dreams. :twisted: :twisted:

gogirlsgo · « **Reply #20 on:** December 03, 2005, 01:31:24 AM »

Quote from: "cheese"

Listen to the CP's on the sidelines, and then listen to the DD's on the bench cheering on the team. Yes the ones on the bench give an occasional "go team" but it's mostly from the CP's. :?
Yes the girls are extremely competitive and want to win all games...who doesn't, but if they won all the games and didn't have fun they would either play for a diff. team next year or just quit.

As they get a little older winning will become just about everything and override the fun factor and even pain. Not too many girls at this age will play with lots of pain, older ones rub it off, get back up, choke back the tears and git-er-done.

It's the CP's who strive to make their DD's better and play on the best team. Just ask your DD if she wants to leave her friends or play on the best team in the state.

I think that is a so true. That is a very accurate post.

Washington-OregonPremierSoccer.Com Forum

Author Topic: U11 Rankings (Read 1896 times)