Let me restate my post. It was definitely NOT a cheap shot...it was aggressive...HUGE difference.He was NOT trying to hurt the player. I think you, Edmonds, are a little wound tight
because it was your kid. It was NOT a RED ...so take your little FIFA book back to the latrine and reread it 
PvMS; Nice try, but be it any player that gets hit from behind with no intent to play the ball, cheapshot, we were 15-20 ft from the play, how far away were you, 50-60-70 yds? or even farthur back standing by the entrance to field as you were later in the game ready to run?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: lol:
As another parent stated, "vicious cheap shot" and another parent stated Eastside plays, how did she put it, "with violent intent" and this from a former soccer player herself.
But enough of this, it's another beautiful day and as we see the cream is rising to the top, Crossfire, Dynamo and FC United leading the league as I stated previously and ECFC and Storm just behind and Snohomish and Heat and EFC Pink
I watched part of the Snoho/FC United game and very good game, both teams had chances but I thought FC United was stronger in the midfield and that was the difference, but Snohomish gave them a tough game and were in it all the way. The FC United defense may be second to none defensively.
I think a song may be in order, either Pat Benatar and her new version of " Eastside Hits'em With the Cheap Shots, they lose anyway " or to honor PvMS and his obvious past experience with time in the "latrine"

, Rush's version of " I Think I'm Going Bald" :mrgreen: :mrgreen: