o.k., I'll bite (even if I post too infrequently for anyone to care what I think), just to let people know that there is a (broad) range of sensibilities here:
Overall: 10% Conservative, 90% Liberal
Social Issues: 0% Conservative, 100% Liberal
Personal Responsibility: 0% Conservative, 100% Liberal
Fiscal Issues: 0% Conservative, 100% Liberal
Ethics: 0% Conservative, 100% Liberal
Defense and Crime: 50% Conservative, 50% Liberal
It's not a very well written questionnaire though - it's almost devoid of nuance or subtlety, and doesn't allow for the kind ambivalence that might accompany one's feelings on some of these issues, especially those where either/or constructions belie real-world possibilities, or the choices are simplistic, reductive, or internally inconsistent. (an example of the latter being the question on immigration policy, where one is asked to choose between less or more strict immigration laws, without allowing for the possibility that enforcement represents a much larger problem than the laws per se as currently written).
A more sophisticated test (and one from which this test borrows several questions) is the Political Compass:
http://www.politicalcompass.orgThe Political Compass questions are, on balance, better crafted, and they ask the respondent whether he/she agrees, "strongly agrees", disagrees, or "strongly disagrees" with a given statement, allowing for a broader range of choices (although I think it would have been better if it had included a "neutral" choice as well). It will take more time to take because there are more questions. It also provides a graph that shows where some of the current politicians are located on "the political compass", as well as other leaders of various stripes, along with some historical figures for good measure (e.g. Gandhi, Mandela, Pope Benedict, Stalin, Hitler, Milton Friedman, etc. So you can compare yourself to more famous counterparts.